The Complexities of Counting Fish: Engaging Citizen Scientists in Fish Monitoring

Authors

  • Karen Bieluch Author
  • Theodore Willis University of Southern Maine image/svg+xml Author
  • Jason Smith Author
  • Karen Wilson Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53558/MQBZ1678

Keywords:

fish monitoring, alewives, citizen science

Abstract

Data gathered by citizen scientists can help ecologists understand long-term trends and can improve the quality and quantity of data about a resource. In Maine and Massa­chusetts, numerous citizen science programs collect data on river herring, anadromous fish that migrate each spring from the ocean to spawn in rivers and lakes. In collabora­tion with state and local resource managers and academic institutions, these programs aim to protect and restore river herring, improve local watersheds, and in some cases, support commercial harvesting. To better understand how programs are run and how data are used by managers, we interviewed program coordinators and resource manag­ers. Interviews revealed that resource managers consider citizen science–generated river herring data in decision making, but that their concerns about data quality affect if and how data are used. Although not without challenges, standardizing monitoring approaches could improve data collection and use. We offer six considerations related to standardization for managers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2017-01-01

How to Cite

The Complexities of Counting Fish: Engaging Citizen Scientists in Fish Monitoring. (2017). Maine Policy Review, 26(2), 9-18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53558/MQBZ1678